Movie

The Hills Have Eyes

Name: The Hills Have Eyes
Released: 2006

2006

15Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

Share your verdict

Is The Hills Have Eyes Woke? Quick Answer

The Hills Have Eyes scores 15/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film. The strongest reasons behind the rating are Dialogue serves the horror narrative without heavy-handed messaging. and characters are primarily developed through their actions and relationships..

See the full breakdown below.

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-07-22

Key reasons

Dialogue serves the horror narrative without heavy-handed messaging.
Characters are primarily developed through their actions and relationships.
While there are some ideological elements, they do not dominate the story.

View full breakdown

The film respects the original's legacy while adding a modern twist.
The horror elements focus on survival and primal fear rather than social commentary.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	4/20	+3
Legacy rewriting	How much an existing franchise, adaptation, setting, or known property appears significantly altered, reinterpreted, or re-centered in ways that feel driven by modern ideological priorities rather than faithful or organic storytelling.	5/20	+3
Anti-traditional framing	How strongly a title normalizes, glamorizes, or positively frames anti-traditional, anti-religious, anti-family, or civilizationally subversive themes in a way that should count as woke or corrosive for this product's audience.	4/20	+3
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	3/20	+2
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

The Hills Have Eyes effectively channels the tension and dread of its horror roots, prioritizing suspenseful storytelling over overt ideological messaging. The dialogue feels organic, enhancing the characters' plight without veering into moral lecturing.

Character development is grounded in their circumstances and relationships, avoiding tokenism while still reflecting a diverse cast. While some themes may resonate with contemporary issues, they are woven into the narrative rather than imposed, allowing the horror elements to take center stage.