Movie

The Hills Have Eyes

Name: The Hills Have Eyes
Released: 2006

2006

9Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is The Hills Have Eyes Woke? Quick Answer

The Hills Have Eyes scores 9/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

The dialogue primarily serves the horror and suspense narrative, with minimal ideological or message-driven content. Characters are motivated by survival and family dynamics rather than symbolic representation or tokenism.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
1/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
1/20
Legacy rewriting
2/20
Modern politics injection
0/20
Protected protagonist pattern
3/20
Anti-traditional framing
1/20
Cultural normalization framing
0/20

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

The dialogue primarily serves the horror and suspense narrative, with minimal ideological or message-driven content.
Characters are motivated by survival and family dynamics rather than symbolic representation or tokenism.
The story focuses on terror and conflict, with ideology playing a negligible role in the plot or character development.

View full breakdown

The film reinterprets the original 1977 cult classic with some updates, but these changes are mostly in service of modern horror sensibilities rather than ideological rewriting.
The protagonist family faces real danger and consequences, and their competence is earned through the narrative context of survival against mutants.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	1/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	1/20	+1
Legacy rewriting	How much an existing franchise, adaptation, setting, or known property appears significantly altered, reinterpreted, or re-centered in ways that feel driven by modern ideological priorities rather than faithful or organic storytelling.	2/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

The 2006 remake of The Hills Have Eyes stays true to its horror roots, prioritizing suspense and survival over ideological messaging or social commentary. Dialogue and character interactions are functional, designed to heighten tension rather than deliver moral lessons or political points.

While the film updates the original story for a contemporary audience, these changes feel more like genre modernization than ideological revisionism. The protagonists are vulnerable and face genuine threats, which grounds the narrative in a realistic survival scenario rather than a protected competence fantasy.