Movie

Jumpers

Name: Jumpers
Released: 2016

2016

10Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

Share your verdict

Is Jumpers Woke? Quick Answer

Jumpers scores 10/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film. The strongest reasons behind the rating are Dialogue serves the emotional stakes rather than an overt message. and characters are primarily developed for their narrative roles, not as symbols..

See the full breakdown below.

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-07-19

Key reasons

Dialogue serves the emotional stakes rather than an overt message.
Characters are primarily developed for their narrative roles, not as symbols.
The story focuses on personal relationships and conflict without heavy ideological framing.

View full breakdown

There are no significant alterations to traditional narratives or established lore.
The film avoids contemporary political discourse, maintaining a timeless feel.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	4/20	+3
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	3/20	+2
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	2/20	+1
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Jumpers presents a tightly focused narrative that revolves around a personal crisis, emphasizing emotional depth and character interaction. The dialogue is crafted to enhance the tension of the moment rather than to deliver a moral or ideological point, which keeps the story grounded and relatable.

Characters are developed through their relationships and struggles rather than being reduced to symbols or tokens of representation. This approach allows for a more organic storytelling experience, where the stakes feel real and the outcomes are earned through character choices and development.