Movie

Eclipse

Name: Eclipse
Released: 2016

2016

5Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Eclipse Woke? Quick Answer

Eclipse scores 5/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

The dialogue appears primarily functional and story-driven, with minimal evidence of overt ideological messaging or moral lecturing. Characters seem organically integrated into the narrative, with no indication they were inserted solely for demographic representation or symbolic purposes.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
2/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
1/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
0/20
Protected protagonist pattern
4/20
Anti-traditional framing
0/20
Cultural normalization framing
0/20

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-13

Key reasons

The dialogue appears primarily functional and story-driven, with minimal evidence of overt ideological messaging or moral lecturing.
Characters seem organically integrated into the narrative, with no indication they were inserted solely for demographic representation or symbolic purposes.
The story prioritizes adventure and fantasy elements over any discernible ideological framing or social commentary.

View full breakdown

The protagonist shows some signs of being a protected figure, as he is involved in a mystical game with high stakes but seems to maintain a degree of charm and agency without clear setbacks detailed in the overview.
There is no indication of anti-traditional themes or cultural normalization of specific social models; the narrative centers on a mystical rivalry and personal relationships.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	4/20	+3
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	2/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Eclipse presents itself as a fantasy adventure with a focus on mystical rivalry and personal stakes rather than ideological messaging. The prophecy and supernatural elements drive the plot, while the protagonist's charm and involvement in the psychic game suggest a competence fantasy with some vulnerability, though the overview does not detail significant consequences or failures.

Dialogue and character interactions appear to serve the story naturally without overt messaging or activist overtones. There is no evidence of modern political discourse or cultural normalization framing the narrative, keeping the story rooted in its fantasy-adventure genre.