Movie

Robin Hood: Men in Tights

Name: Robin Hood: Men in Tights
Released: 1993

1993

9Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Robin Hood: Men in Tights Woke? Quick Answer

Robin Hood: Men in Tights scores 9/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

The dialogue is primarily comedic and parody-driven, with few moments of overt messaging or ideological lecturing. Characters are mostly caricatures serving humor rather than symbolic representation or tokenism.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
2/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
1/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
0/20
Protected protagonist pattern
3/20
Anti-traditional framing
0/20
Cultural normalization framing
0/20

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

The dialogue is primarily comedic and parody-driven, with few moments of overt messaging or ideological lecturing.
Characters are mostly caricatures serving humor rather than symbolic representation or tokenism.
The story prioritizes humor and entertainment over ideological framing or social commentary.

View full breakdown

The film plays loosely with Robin Hood lore but does so for comedic effect rather than ideological rewriting.
The protagonist faces comedic setbacks and challenges, though the tone allows for some exaggerated invincibility typical of parody.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	2/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Robin Hood: Men in Tights is a parody comedy that focuses on humor and satire rather than ideological messaging or social commentary. The dialogue is playful and designed to entertain, avoiding heavy-handed moralizing or message-first exchanges.

Characters are exaggerated for comedic effect but do not feel inserted merely for political signaling or tokenism. The film loosely plays with the Robin Hood legend, but the alterations serve parody rather than an ideological agenda or legacy rewriting.

The protagonist and supporting cast experience setbacks and challenges, though the tone allows for some comedic invincibility and lore bending typical of spoof films. There is no injection of modern political discourse or anti-traditional framing; the film embraces traditional comedic tropes without pushing contemporary culture-war themes.