Movie

Futurama: Bender's Big Score

Name: Futurama: Bender's Big Score
Released: 2007

2007

17Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Futurama: Bender's Big Score Woke? Quick Answer

Futurama: Bender's Big Score scores 17/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

The dialogue largely serves comedic and plot purposes with minimal overt ideological lecturing or message-driven exchanges. Characters feel organically integrated into the story with their established personalities driving the narrative rather than serving as mere tokens.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
2/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
2/20
Legacy rewriting
1/20
Modern politics injection
1/20
Protected protagonist pattern
3/20
Anti-traditional framing
1/20
Cultural normalization framing
1/20

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

The dialogue largely serves comedic and plot purposes with minimal overt ideological lecturing or message-driven exchanges.
Characters feel organically integrated into the story with their established personalities driving the narrative rather than serving as mere tokens.
The story prioritizes humor, sci-fi adventure, and character dynamics over social commentary or activism.

View full breakdown

While the film revisits and expands the original series' timeline, it does not significantly rewrite legacy elements for ideological reasons.
There are minor moments of modern cultural references but they do not dominate or disrupt the escapist sci-fi setting.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	2/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	2/20	+1
Legacy rewriting	How much an existing franchise, adaptation, setting, or known property appears significantly altered, reinterpreted, or re-centered in ways that feel driven by modern ideological priorities rather than faithful or organic storytelling.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Futurama: Bender's Big Score maintains the irreverent, comedic tone that defined the original series, focusing on time travel hijinks and character-driven humor rather than ideological messaging. The dialogue is witty and plot-focused, avoiding heavy-handed social commentary or moralizing.

Characters remain true to their established traits, with Bender's larcenous tendencies and the crew's incompetence driving the story rather than any forced symbolic representation. The film lightly plays with the series' timeline, but these legacy elements serve the sci-fi comedy narrative rather than pushing a modern ideological agenda.