Movie

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

Name: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Released: 1982

1982

7Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan Woke? Quick Answer

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan scores 7/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

Dialogue primarily serves the plot and character development rather than pushing ideological messages. Characters are well-integrated into the story with clear motivations and depth, not token placeholders.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
2/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
1/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
0/20
Protected protagonist pattern
3/20
Anti-traditional framing
0/20
Cultural normalization framing
0/20

AI vs Community

Community verdict is still forming.

1 vote so far. We publish a community verdict after 5; 4 more needed.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

Dialogue primarily serves the plot and character development rather than pushing ideological messages.
Characters are well-integrated into the story with clear motivations and depth, not token placeholders.
The story focuses on classic sci-fi themes of revenge, sacrifice, and duty without ideological overreach.

View full breakdown

The film respects established Star Trek lore without major reinterpretations or ideological retcons.
The protagonist faces real consequences and challenges, grounding the competence in narrative context.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	2/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan stands as a quintessential example of story-driven science fiction cinema. The film's dialogue is focused on advancing the plot and deepening character relationships rather than delivering overt social or political messages.

Characters like Kirk and Khan are portrayed with complexity and clear motivations, avoiding tokenistic or symbolic roles. The narrative prioritizes classic themes such as revenge, sacrifice, and leadership, maintaining a strong internal logic consistent with the established Star Trek universe.