Game

Ratchet and Clank: A Crack in Time

2009

Platforms: PlayStation 3Genres: Action, Arcade

4Score

Peak Gaming

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Game metadata from RAWG.

Is Ratchet and Clank: A Crack in Time Woke? Quick Answer

Ratchet and Clank: A Crack in Time scores 4/100 on the IsItWoke scale and falls into Peak Gaming.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this game.

Dialogue serves the story and character interactions without overt messaging. Characters are well-developed and integral to the narrative rather than mere symbols.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
2/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
1/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
1/20
Protected protagonist pattern
2/20
Anti-traditional framing
0/20
Cultural normalization framing
0/20

AI vs Community

AI says Peak Gaming. What do users say?

AI verdict: Peak Gaming. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-09-05

Key reasons

Dialogue serves the story and character interactions without overt messaging.
Characters are well-developed and integral to the narrative rather than mere symbols.
The story prioritizes adventure and character growth over ideological concerns.

View full breakdown

No significant alterations to established lore or character backgrounds for modern agendas.
The game maintains a light-hearted tone without heavy political undertones.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	2/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	1/20	+1
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	1/20	+1
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	2/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Ratchet and Clank: A Crack in Time excels in delivering a cohesive and engaging narrative that prioritizes character development and adventure over ideological messaging. The dialogue feels natural and fits seamlessly into the story, allowing players to immerse themselves in the action without being lectured.

The characters, particularly Ratchet and Clank, are well-rounded and serve a clear purpose within the narrative, avoiding the pitfalls of tokenism or agenda-driven construction. The game respects its legacy and does not attempt to rewrite its established lore or character arcs to fit contemporary narratives.