TV Show

Star Trek

Name: Star Trek
Released: 1973

1973

13Score

Peak Television

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Star Trek Woke? Quick Answer

Star Trek scores 13/100 on the IsItWoke scale and lands in Peak Television.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this show.

Dialogue serves the story rather than pushing a moral agenda. Characters are well-developed and integral to the narrative.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
5/20
Tokenistic characters
2/20
Ideology over story
4/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
1/20
Protected protagonist pattern
3/20
Anti-traditional framing
2/20
Cultural normalization framing
3/20

AI vs Community

AI says Peak Television. What do users say?

AI verdict: Peak Television. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Season Wokeness Breakdown

Season-by-season woke breakdown coming soon.

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-09-20

Key reasons

Dialogue serves the story rather than pushing a moral agenda.
Characters are well-developed and integral to the narrative.
The storytelling prioritizes adventure and exploration over ideology.

View full breakdown

No significant alterations to established lore or characters.
Themes of cooperation and understanding are present but not heavy-handed.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	5/20	+3
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	4/20	+3
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Cultural normalization framing	How much the title repeatedly frames a specific social model, identity/sexuality framing, lifestyle, family structure, or set of values as culturally meaningful, normalizing, morally instructive, or aspirational. Increase score when the work itself is explicitly positioned around that cultural proposition - through narrative, marketing, advocacy, or identity-specific educational/sexual content. Mere presence of any demographic or an incidental relationship is not enough.	3/20	+2
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	2/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

The animated series maintains a strong focus on storytelling, with character interactions that feel organic and engaging. Dialogue is primarily driven by the plot, allowing for exploration of themes without overt moral lecturing.

Characters like Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock are portrayed with depth and complexity, avoiding the pitfalls of tokenism or agenda-driven writing. While there are moments that reflect contemporary values, they are woven into the narrative rather than dominating it.

The series does not break established lore or present characters as invincible; instead, they face challenges that contribute to their growth and development. Overall, the narrative remains true to the spirit of the original series, prioritizing adventure and character over ideological messaging.