Movie

Close

Name: Close
Released: 2022

2022

26Score

Very Little Woke

Mostly focused on storytelling.

Share your verdict

Is Close Woke? Quick Answer

Close scores 26/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Very Little Woke.

Messaging can show up, but it is not the main event in this film. The strongest reasons behind the rating are Dialogue occasionally leans into messaging about friendship and identity, but it doesn't overwhelm the narrative. and characters are generally well-developed, though some elements feel slightly symbolic..

See the full breakdown below.

AI vs Community

AI says Very Little Woke. What do users say?

AI verdict: Very Little Woke. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-08-07

Key reasons

Dialogue occasionally leans into messaging about friendship and identity, but it doesn't overwhelm the narrative.
Characters are generally well-developed, though some elements feel slightly symbolic.
The story maintains a focus on emotional depth, but there are moments where ideology seeps in.

View full breakdown

The film does not significantly alter any existing narratives, keeping its focus on original storytelling.
While there are hints of modern themes, they are woven into the story without dominating it.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	8/20	+5
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	6/20	+4
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	5/20	+3
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	3/20	+2
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	4/20	+2

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Close presents a poignant exploration of friendship and the pressures of adolescence, focusing on the emotional landscape of two boys navigating their bond. The narrative is primarily character-driven, allowing for organic development and relatable experiences.

However, some dialogue does veer into message territory, reflecting contemporary discussions about identity and connection, which can feel somewhat imposed at times. The characters, while generally well-rounded, occasionally embody thematic symbols rather than fully realized individuals, leading to a slight sense of tokenism.