Movie

Holes

Name: Holes
Released: 2003

2003

16Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Holes Woke? Quick Answer

Holes scores 16/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

Dialogue generally serves the story and character development with only occasional moments that feel slightly didactic or moralistic. Characters feel organically integrated into the narrative rather than inserted for symbolic representation, though some diversity is present without heavy emphasis.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
3/20
Tokenistic characters
2/20
Ideology over story
3/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
1/20
Protected protagonist pattern
4/20
Anti-traditional framing
1/20
Cultural normalization framing
1/20

AI vs Community

Community verdict is still forming.

1 vote so far. We publish a community verdict after 5; 4 more needed.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

Dialogue generally serves the story and character development with only occasional moments that feel slightly didactic or moralistic.
Characters feel organically integrated into the narrative rather than inserted for symbolic representation, though some diversity is present without heavy emphasis.
The plot prioritizes adventure and mystery over overt ideological framing, maintaining engagement through story and character arcs.

View full breakdown

The film adapts the source material faithfully without significant ideological reinterpretation or legacy rewriting.
The protagonist faces real challenges and consequences, with competence earned through experience rather than being unearned or protected.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	4/20	+3
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	3/20	+2
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	3/20	+2
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	2/20	+1
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Holes delivers a story-driven adventure that balances drama, comedy, and mystery without succumbing to heavy ideological messaging. The dialogue and character interactions mostly support the plot, with only minor moments that could be seen as moralizing.

The characters are well-developed and fit naturally within the narrative, avoiding tokenistic pitfalls despite some diversity in the cast. The film stays true to the original source material, avoiding modern ideological rewrites or cultural agenda impositions.

While there is some mild presence of contemporary values, these are subtle and do not overshadow the story's core themes of friendship, perseverance, and uncovering family secrets. The protagonist experiences genuine setbacks and growth, grounding the film in a realistic competence fantasy rather than an invincible hero trope.