Movie

Coherence

Name: Coherence
Released: 2014

2014

6Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is Coherence Woke? Quick Answer

Coherence scores 6/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film.

The dialogue primarily serves to advance the mystery and tension rather than deliver overt ideological messaging or moralizing. Characters are developed through their interactions and reactions to the unfolding events, not as symbolic tokens or demographic checkboxes.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
1/20
Tokenistic characters
1/20
Ideology over story
1/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
0/20
Protected protagonist pattern
2/20
Anti-traditional framing
0/20
Cultural normalization framing
0/20

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

The dialogue primarily serves to advance the mystery and tension rather than deliver overt ideological messaging or moralizing.
Characters are developed through their interactions and reactions to the unfolding events, not as symbolic tokens or demographic checkboxes.
The story prioritizes suspense and sci-fi intrigue over any discernible social or political agenda, maintaining immersion and pacing.

View full breakdown

There is no indication of franchise legacy or source material being altered for ideological reasons, as this is an original film.
The protagonist and other characters face real consequences and challenges, with competence and vulnerability grounded in the narrative context.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	1/20	+1
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	1/20	+1
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	1/20	+1
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	2/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Coherence is a tight, low-budget sci-fi thriller that focuses on the unraveling reality experienced by a group of friends during a comet's passing. The film's strength lies in its story-first approach, using dialogue and character dynamics to build suspense without resorting to ideological framing or message-driven exchanges.

Characters feel like real people caught in extraordinary circumstances rather than vessels for social commentary or token representation. The narrative maintains internal logic with only minor speculative leaps typical of the genre, and the protagonists face genuine stakes and consequences, avoiding the protected protagonist trope.