TV Show

The Story of The Netherlands

Name: The Story of The Netherlands
Released: 2022

2022

57Score

Slightly Woke

A few message-driven moments appear.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is The Story of The Netherlands Woke? Quick Answer

The Story of The Netherlands scores 57/100 on the IsItWoke scale and lands in Slightly Woke.

You get some message-forward moments, and story still has to carry the show.

The narration frequently uses collective 'we' language, which frames the historical narrative as a unified national identity, pushing a message-first dialogue style. Characters are not a focus here, as the series is a documentary, so tokenism in character creation is minimal or irrelevant.

See the full breakdown below.

Signal profile

What is driving this verdict

Messaging

Political messaging: Medium

Narrative focus

Identity / sexuality centrality: Medium

These are structured scoring signals, not standalone factual claims. Read them together with the source-backed receipts and full analysis below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
14/20
Tokenistic characters
2/20
Ideology over story
12/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
5/20
Protected protagonist pattern
0/20
Anti-traditional framing
0/20
Cultural normalization framing
15/20

Receipts used in this verdict

Medium confidence

These source-linked claims were gathered before scoring. Supporting evidence can raise a relevant signal; counterevidence can reduce or contextualize it. Corporate statements, consultant credits and optional identity cosmetics are context for investigation. They do not establish narrative ideology or directly raise the score.

Reveal detailed receipts · may contain spoilers

The verdict above is spoiler-light. The concrete examples below can describe scenes, plot turns, character outcomes, or late-game material.

Cultural normalizationsupporting
The official project description presents the series as telling “the story of the country we live in” and showing “how it has made us who we are today,” framing the history as a narrative intended to normalize a contemporary national self-understanding. [1]
Message-first dialoguesupporting
Scholarly commentary notes that narrator Daan Schuurmans repeatedly speaks of historical groups in the ‘we’ form, using ‘ons’ (our) and thereby adopting a collective, thesis-like voice that frames the series’ dialogue in a message-driven manner. [2]

Sources (2)

Research checked 2026-10-07

AI vs Community

AI says Slightly Woke. What do users say?

AI verdict: Slightly Woke. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Season Wokeness Breakdown

Season-by-season woke breakdown coming soon.

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-07

Key reasons

The narration frequently uses collective 'we' language, which frames the historical narrative as a unified national identity, pushing a message-first dialogue style.
Characters are not a focus here, as the series is a documentary, so tokenism in character creation is minimal or irrelevant.
The storytelling prioritizes delivering a cohesive ideological thesis about national identity over purely immersive or conflict-driven narrative pacing.

View full breakdown

There is no evidence of legacy rewriting or altering known historical facts for ideological purposes; the series sticks to a national history documentary format.
Modern political themes are subtly injected through the framing of history as a continuous story that shapes present-day identity, which may feel like contemporary cultural normalization.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	14/20	+9
Cultural normalization framing	How much the title repeatedly frames a specific social model, identity/sexuality framing, lifestyle, family structure, or set of values as culturally meaningful, normalizing, morally instructive, or aspirational. Increase score when the work itself is explicitly positioned around that cultural proposition - through narrative, marketing, advocacy, or identity-specific educational/sexual content. Mere presence of any demographic or an incidental relationship is not enough.	15/20	+9
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	12/20	+8
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	5/20	+3
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	2/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

The Story of the Netherlands positions itself as a collective national narrative, using a message-driven narration style that repeatedly emphasizes a shared identity. This approach leans heavily on ideological framing, presenting history as a means to normalize and validate contemporary Dutch self-understanding.

While the documentary format naturally limits character development and legacy rewriting, the series leans into a thesis-driven voice that can overshadow pure historical storytelling. The use of inclusive pronouns and framing suggests a deliberate cultural normalization effort, making the history feel like a foundational myth for modern identity.