Super Mario Bros. poster
Movie

Super Mario Bros.

1993

91Score
Certified Woke Trash

Messaging overwhelms the narrative.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.
Share this verdict card

Is Super Mario Bros. Woke? Quick Answer

Super Mario Bros. scores 91/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Certified Woke Trash.

The messaging is doing a lot of the work in this film.

The dialogue rarely feels like it is pushing a social or political message, focusing instead on comedic and adventurous banter. Some characters appear to be shaped more by the need to fit the bizarre alternate universe setting than by deep characterization, but this is mostly due to the film's campy tone rather than tokenism.

See the full breakdown below.

Signal profile

What is driving this verdict

Story impact

Lore / logic break: Medium

These are structured scoring signals, not standalone factual claims. Read them together with the source-backed receipts and full analysis below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

  • Message-first dialogue

    2/20
  • Tokenistic characters

    3/20
  • Ideology over story

    2/20
  • Legacy rewriting

    7/20
  • Modern politics injection

    1/20
  • Protected protagonist pattern

    5/20
  • Anti-traditional framing

    1/20
  • Cultural normalization framing

    1/20

AI vs Community

Community verdict is still forming.

1 vote so far. We publish a community verdict after 5; 4 more needed.

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

  • The dialogue rarely feels like it is pushing a social or political message, focusing instead on comedic and adventurous banter.
  • Some characters appear to be shaped more by the need to fit the bizarre alternate universe setting than by deep characterization, but this is mostly due to the film's campy tone rather than tokenism.
  • The story prioritizes entertainment and fantasy elements over ideological framing, though the plot often sacrifices internal logic for spectacle.
View full breakdown
  • The film significantly reinterprets the original video game source material, transforming the bright, cartoonish world into a darker, dystopian setting, which feels more like a legacy rewrite than faithful adaptation.
  • The protagonists face real dangers and setbacks, but their competence sometimes feels uneven, and the narrative occasionally shields them from lasting consequences.

Score signals

SignalWhat was measuredStrengthImpact
Legacy rewritingHow much an existing franchise, adaptation, setting, or known property appears significantly altered, reinterpreted, or re-centered in ways that feel driven by modern ideological priorities rather than faithful or organic storytelling.7/20+4
Protected protagonist patternHow much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.5/20+3
Tokenistic charactersHow much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.3/20+2
Message-first dialogueHow much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.2/20+1
Ideology over storyHow much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.2/20+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Super Mario Bros. (1993) is a curious case of a legacy property undergoing a heavy transformation that leans more into dystopian fantasy and camp than faithful adaptation. The story prioritizes a quirky adventure tone over ideological messaging, resulting in dialogue that is mostly light and comedic rather than message-driven.

However, the film's reimagining of the source material into a grimy, alternate dinosaur world breaks with established lore and franchise expectations, which may alienate fans seeking fidelity. While the protagonists Mario and Luigi encounter genuine threats and challenges, their competence fluctuates, and at times the story protects them from meaningful consequences, though not to an extreme degree.

Related titles

More like this.

People also checked

What others ran after this one.

Run Super Mario Bros. through another test

Explore

Trending now

Send feedback

We send your description, report type, optional email and the current page path. No browsing history or session transcript is included.