Movie

It

Name: It
Released: 2017

2017

13Score

Absolute Cinema

Story over sermons. Cinema first.

Share your verdict

Is It Woke? Quick Answer

It scores 13/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Absolute Cinema.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this film. The strongest reasons behind the rating are Dialogue serves character development and plot rather than overt messaging. and characters are well-rounded and contribute to the narrative organically..

See the full breakdown below.

AI vs Community

AI says Absolute Cinema. What do users say?

AI verdict: Absolute Cinema. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-07-22

Key reasons

Dialogue serves character development and plot rather than overt messaging.
Characters are well-rounded and contribute to the narrative organically.
The story prioritizes horror and personal growth over ideological themes.

View full breakdown

There is minimal modern political discourse that feels out of place.
The film respects its source material without significant alterations.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	5/20	+3
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	4/20	+3
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	3/20	+2
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	2/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

It successfully blends horror with the coming-of-age story of the Losers Club, focusing on their personal struggles and friendships. The dialogue feels authentic, allowing characters to express their fears and growth without being bogged down by overt messaging.

While there are moments of social commentary, they are woven into the narrative rather than dominating it. The characters are relatable and flawed, avoiding the pitfalls of tokenism, which allows for a more immersive experience.

The film's approach to its themes is grounded in the characters' experiences, making their journey feel earned and impactful. Overall, It manages to balance its horror elements with character-driven storytelling, steering clear of the heavy-handedness that plagues many modern adaptations.