Movie

The To Do List

Name: The To Do List
Released: 2013

2013

47Score

Slightly Woke

A few message-driven moments appear.

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Is The To Do List Woke? Quick Answer

The To Do List scores 47/100 on the IsItWoke scale and is rated Slightly Woke.

You get some message-forward moments, and story still has to carry the film.

The dialogue often leans into awkward, message-driven conversations about sexual liberation and empowerment that sometimes feel more like social commentary than natural teen banter. Characters occasionally serve as representations of various sexual or social archetypes, which can feel tokenistic rather than deeply developed, especially in supporting roles.

See the full breakdown below.

Signal profile

What is driving this verdict

Messaging

Political messaging: Present

Narrative focus

Identity / sexuality centrality: Medium

These are structured scoring signals, not standalone factual claims. Read them together with the source-backed receipts and full analysis below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
6/20
Tokenistic characters
3/20
Ideology over story
5/20
Legacy rewriting
0/20
Modern politics injection
3/20
Protected protagonist pattern
8/20
Anti-traditional framing
7/20
Cultural normalization framing
6/20

AI vs Community

AI says Slightly Woke. What do users say?

AI verdict: Slightly Woke. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-10-12

Key reasons

The dialogue often leans into awkward, message-driven conversations about sexual liberation and empowerment that sometimes feel more like social commentary than natural teen banter.
Characters occasionally serve as representations of various sexual or social archetypes, which can feel tokenistic rather than deeply developed, especially in supporting roles.
The story prioritizes themes of sexual exploration and empowerment in a way that sometimes overshadows organic romantic or comedic storytelling, pushing a clear cultural agenda.

View full breakdown

The protagonist is framed as needing to complete a checklist to 'catch up' socially, which can feel like an imposed competence fantasy with limited real consequences or vulnerabilities shown.
There is a positive framing of anti-traditional sexual norms and a normalization of casual sexual experiences as aspirational, which marks a clear departure from conservative values.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	8/20	+5
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	6/20	+4
Anti-traditional framing	How strongly a title normalizes, glamorizes, or positively frames anti-traditional, anti-religious, anti-family, or civilizationally subversive themes in a way that should count as woke or corrosive for this product's audience.	7/20	+4
Cultural normalization framing	How much the title repeatedly frames a specific social model, identity/sexuality framing, lifestyle, family structure, or set of values as culturally meaningful, normalizing, morally instructive, or aspirational. Increase score when the work itself is explicitly positioned around that cultural proposition - through narrative, marketing, advocacy, or identity-specific educational/sexual content. Mere presence of any demographic or an incidental relationship is not enough.	6/20	+4
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	5/20	+3

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

The To Do List centers its narrative around a young woman's sexual awakening framed as a checklist to gain social acceptance before college. This premise inherently ties the story to a cultural proposition about sexual liberation and empowerment, which colors much of the dialogue and character interactions.

While the film aims for comedy and romance, the messaging about sexual experience often takes precedence, leading to dialogue that can feel forced or agenda-driven rather than naturally flowing. Characters sometimes appear more as symbols of different sexual identities or experiences rather than fully fleshed-out individuals, which can detract from narrative depth.