Game

inFAMOUS 2

2011

Platforms: PlayStation 3Genres: Action, Adventure

11Score

Peak Gaming

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Game metadata from RAWG.

Is inFAMOUS 2 Woke? Quick Answer

inFAMOUS 2 scores 11/100 on the IsItWoke scale and falls into Peak Gaming.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this game.

The dialogue serves the story without overt moral lecturing. Characters are well-developed and not merely symbolic.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
3/20
Tokenistic characters
2/20
Ideology over story
4/20
Legacy rewriting
1/20
Modern politics injection
2/20
Protected protagonist pattern
3/20
Anti-traditional framing
1/20
Cultural normalization framing
2/20

AI vs Community

AI says Peak Gaming. What do users say?

AI verdict: Peak Gaming. Be among the first to challenge it.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-09-27

Key reasons

The dialogue serves the story without overt moral lecturing.
Characters are well-developed and not merely symbolic.
The narrative prioritizes action and character growth over ideology.

View full breakdown

No significant alterations to existing lore or franchise identity.
The protagonist faces real challenges and consequences.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	4/20	+3
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	3/20	+2
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	3/20	+2
Tokenistic characters	How much characters feel inserted or shaped primarily for symbolic representation, political signaling, or demographic checkbox value rather than narrative depth, organic fit, or strong characterization.	2/20	+1
Legacy rewriting	How much an existing franchise, adaptation, setting, or known property appears significantly altered, reinterpreted, or re-centered in ways that feel driven by modern ideological priorities rather than faithful or organic storytelling.	1/20	+1

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

inFAMOUS 2 is a solid action-adventure game that emphasizes gameplay and character development over ideological messaging. The dialogue is crafted to enhance the narrative rather than push a specific agenda, allowing players to immerse themselves in the story without feeling lectured.

Characters are fleshed out and serve the plot well, avoiding the pitfalls of tokenism that often plague modern narratives. While there are moral choices to be made, they feel organic and tied to the gameplay experience rather than imposed by a heavy-handed agenda.