Game

Assassin's Creed Origins

2017

Platforms: Xbox One, PC, PlayStation 4Genres: Action, RPG

16Score

Peak Gaming

My list →Saved on this device — no account required.

Share this verdict card

Game metadata from RAWG.

Is Assassin's Creed Origins Woke? Quick Answer

Assassin's Creed Origins scores 16/100 on the IsItWoke scale and falls into Peak Gaming.

That is the story-first end of the scale for this game.

Dialogue serves the plot without overt messaging. Characters have depth beyond mere representation.

See the full breakdown below.

Woke profile

How the score is shaped

Eight stored dimensions, each scored from 0 to 20.

Message

Characters

Story

Legacy

Politics

Lead

Tradition

Norms

Column height is the stored score out of 20

Message-first dialogue
3/20
Tokenistic characters
2/20
Ideology over story
4/20
Legacy rewriting
5/20
Modern politics injection
3/20
Protected protagonist pattern
4/20
Anti-traditional framing
2/20
Cultural normalization framing
3/20

AI vs Community

Community verdict is still forming.

1 vote so far. We publish a community verdict after 5; 4 more needed.

Challenge the AI See most disputed titles

Community verdict

Pick the band you think fits. One vote per browser on this title. You cannot change it after you vote.

Loading community votes…

Why it received this score

Based on: Published title analysisConfidence: MediumLast updated: 2026-07-09

Key reasons

Dialogue serves the plot without overt messaging.
Characters have depth beyond mere representation.
Storytelling is prioritized over ideological framing.

View full breakdown

Some legacy elements are reinterpreted but not excessively.
Minor modern political themes are present but not intrusive.

Score signals

Signal	What was measured	Strength	Impact
Ideology over story	How much the overall storytelling prioritizes ideological framing, message delivery, social commentary, or activism-coded narrative choices over pacing, conflict, immersion, and entertainment.	4/20	+3
Legacy rewriting	How much an existing franchise, adaptation, setting, or known property appears significantly altered, reinterpreted, or re-centered in ways that feel driven by modern ideological priorities rather than faithful or organic storytelling.	5/20	+3
Protected protagonist pattern	How much the protagonist fits the protected-protagonist pattern (agenda-driven character construction) rather than competence fantasy. Score HIGH only when: competence appears unearned or unexplained; protagonist rarely faces consequences; antagonists exist mainly to demonstrate protagonist superiority; narrative treats protagonist as symbolically superior; plot shields protagonist from vulnerability. Score LOW when: competence is grounded in training, profession, or past experience; protagonist suffers damage or setbacks; real physical danger and survival tension exist (normal action storytelling). Do not penalize competence fantasy.	4/20	+3
Message-first dialogue	How much the dialogue, monologues, or character interactions feel driven by overt messaging, moral lecturing, ideological framing, or making a point instead of serving the story naturally.	3/20	+2
Modern politics injection	How much contemporary political discourse, activist framing, or modern culture-war signaling appears injected into fantasy, sci-fi, historical, or otherwise escapist settings in a way that feels noticeable or immersion-breaking.	3/20	+2

AI cultural analysis

A short read on tone, themes, and messaging — not a plot synopsis.

AI read

Assassin's Creed Origins successfully weaves a narrative that focuses on character development and immersive gameplay rather than overt ideological messaging. The dialogue feels natural, allowing players to engage with the story without being lectured.

Characters like Bayek and Aya are well-rounded, avoiding the pitfalls of tokenism, and their motivations are grounded in the historical context of the game. While there are some modern themes present, they do not overshadow the core story of the Assassins versus Templars.