Compare only works for titles already in our database with a verdict. If something doesn't show up in the lists below, find it from the home search, run analysis first, then come back to this page.

Switch titles

Category
First title
Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance

Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance

2002

Category
Second title
The Last of Us Part II

The Last of Us Part II

2020

Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance vs The Last of Us Part II: Which Is More Woke?

Share this comparison

Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance vs The Last of Us Part II: Quick Comparison

Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance and The Last of Us Part II are both games. Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance landed in 2002; The Last of Us Part II in 2020. People look up Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance vs The Last of Us Part II, or Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance or The Last of Us Part II, when they want a straight compare of the two.

Below is a side-by-side of the facts we have, then how their political messaging, cultural themes, and IsItWoke scores differ. This is not a review of which is better to play.

Side-by-side comparison of Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance and The Last of Us Part II
FieldMetal Gear Solid 2: SubstanceThe Last of Us Part II
Release year20022020
TypeGameGame
GenresAction, ShooterAction, Shooter, Adventure
PlatformsXbox, PC, PlayStation 2PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5
Woke Score12/10071/100
Community Score10/10052/100
VerdictPeak GamingVery Woke

The Last of Us Part II appears more woke than Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance based on AI analysis, with a difference of about 59 points. Community votes agree with the AI verdict.

AI vs community

AI verdict

The Last of Us Part II is more woke than Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance (AI).

The Last of Us Part II leads by 59 points on the AI scale.

Community verdict

The Last of Us Part II reads more woke in community votes than Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance.

Vote-weighted spread: about 42 points (10 vs 52).

Why the scores diverge

  • The 59-point gap reflects how much ideology steers each story on our six-dimension pass, not just vibes.
  • The Last of Us Part II highlight: Dialogue often feels like it serves an ideological agenda rather than character development.
  • Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance highlight: Dialogue serves the plot and character development rather than overt messaging.
  • Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance: Characters are well-rounded and integral to the story, avoiding tokenism.
  • The Last of Us Part II: Characters are sometimes shaped more by their symbolic roles than by organic narrative needs.

The Last of Us Part II reads higher on message-first dialogue than Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, which nudges the overall profile message-forward. The Last of Us Part II reads higher on tokenistic characters than Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, which nudges the overall profile message-forward. The Last of Us Part II reads higher on legacy rewriting than Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance, which nudges the overall profile message-forward.

Browse more

Other matchups that share Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance or The Last of Us Part II.

Trending now

Frequently asked questions

Which is more woke, Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance or The Last of Us Part II?
The Last of Us Part II scores higher on the AI pass (71/100 vs 12/100).
What do community votes say?
Votes lean more woke on The Last of Us Part II (52 vs 10 on our vote-weighted scale).
Why might AI and votes disagree?
AI scores come from a structured model pass; votes capture how people read the politics or messaging. Trailers, culture-war framing, and release timing can push votes away from the model.

Send feedback

We send your description, report type, optional email and the current page path. No browsing history or session transcript is included.