
Vampire's Kiss
1989
Insufficient evidence
We did not find enough credible, independent evidence to publish a numeric cash-grab score. Unrated is more honest than a guess.
What counts as a cash grab?
Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.
Why?
Vampire's Kiss is a 1989 black comedy directed by Robert Bierman and written by Joseph Minion, released by Hemdale. Production records and trade data show a modest budget (commonly listed around $2 million) and a very small theatrical gross, and contemporary reviews and later analysis emphasize Nicolas Cage's extreme performance and the film's low-budget craft. I found no credible reporting of predatory monetization, deceptive release practices, or franchise-style reuse that would meet the definition of a cash grab.
- Contemporary records list a modest budget and very low box office returns.
- No credible sources report predatory monetization, deceptive pricing, or rushed release tactics.
- The film is an original screenplay by Joseph Minion, not a franchise or adaptation.
View full breakdownHide full breakdown
Score factors
| Direction | Factor | Evidence | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Against | Budget and box office | Contemporary records and film databases list a modest production budget around $2 million and a worldwide box office under $1 million, showing the film was not a high-return commercial release.[6][1][5] | -12 |
| Against | Original screenplay, not franchise | The screenplay is credited to Joseph Minion and the film is presented as an original work, not as a sequel, remake, adaptation, or franchise entry.[1] | -12 |
| Against | Production craft and critical response | Contemporary reviews and later critical accounts emphasize the film's distinctive direction and Nicolas Cage's extreme performance, and scholarship and interviews discuss a difficult low-budget production rather than low-effort reuse.[3][4][2] | -15 |
| Against | Cult status and lasting audience interest | Although the film was a box-office failure on release, multiple sources note it later developed a cult following, indicating enduring consumer interest in its unusual content rather than purely transactional exploitation.[1][7] | -10 |
Confidence: Low · No source-backed commercial-extraction signal was found. · Researched 2026-08-12
Sources reviewed
- [1]en.wikipedia.org
- [2]academic.oup.com
- [3]www.latimes.com
- [4]www.timeout.com
- [5]www.boxofficemojo.com
- [6]www.moviefone.com
- [7]www.rottentomatoes.com
- [8]www.imdb.com
- [9]en.wikipedia.org
- [10]en.wikipedia.org
View 13 more sourcesShow fewer sources
- [11]m.imdb.com
- [12]www.gpedia.com
- [13]www.imdb.com
- [14]en.wikipedia.org
- [15]www.latimes.com
- [16]justapedia.org
- [17]en.wikipedia.org
- [18]en.wikipedia.org
- [19]www.astiberri.com
- [20]www.reddit.com
- [21]ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk
- [22]s3.amazonaws.com
- [23]www.reddit.com