Game

This is the Police

2016

0Score

Low Cash-Grab Risk

The sourced concerns are substantially offset by delivered value.

What counts as a cash grab?

Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.

Why?

This Is the Police (2016) was released as a paid premium game and subsequent mobile ports were explicitly marketed as one-time purchases without ads or in-app purchases. Professional coverage and storefront listings show a normal single-purchase price point rather than microtransaction systems. Reviews praise the writing, art and audio while also criticizing repetitive mechanics and pacing, but I found no credible reporting or storefront evidence that the title used loot boxes, predatory IAP, or aggressive post‑release monetization schemes.

Mobile ports were marketed as premium one-time purchases with no in-app purchases or ads.
Storefront reporting shows a standard single-purchase price rather than microtransaction-driven pricing.
Multiple professional reviews praise narrative, art and audio, indicating substantive content.

View full breakdown

Critics flagged repetitive mechanics and pacing, which reduce perceived gameplay value but do not prove predatory monetization.

Score factors

Direction	Factor	Evidence	Impact
Against	Substantive narrative and production craft	Multiple professional reviews highlight strong writing, visuals and audio, indicating significant creative effort and substantive new content.[2][1]	-16
Against	No in-app purchases on mobile ports	Publisher and port reporting state the mobile versions were released as premium apps with no in-app purchases, ads, or loot boxes.[3][5][4]	-14
For	Gameplay criticisms reduce consumer value	Several reviews called out repetitive dispatch mechanics, pacing problems and shallow systems that diminish gameplay depth and consumer value.[6][7]	+13

Confidence: High · Evidence comes from storefront listings, publisher/port reporting and multiple professional reviews; no credible sources indicate microtransactions or predatory monetization though internal sales contracts and undisclosed postrelease publisher practices are not publicly available. · Researched 2026-09-28

Sources reviewed

View 35 more sources

What does the community think?

The AI sees low cash-grab risk. What's your read?

Loading community verdict…

Run This is the Police through another test

Did they use AI?Evidence tracker

Back to the woke verdict