
Postal 4: No Regrets
2022
Several sourced extraction signals remain unresolved.
What counts as a cash grab?
Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.
Why?
Postal 4: No Regerts, released on PC in April 2022, was marketed as the "true sequel" to Postal 2 but received broadly negative critical response for poor optimization, frequent bugs, and dated crude humor. Reviews and aggregator pages show generally unfavorable scores and repeated criticism that the game largely reuses the franchise formula without meaningful improvements. Price-tracking sites and storefront data document repeated steep discounts after release. I found evidence of technical shortcomings and branding leverage, but not of predatory microtransactions or explicit deceptive financial practices.
- Widespread critical reports of bugs, poor optimization, and low review scores at and after release.
- Official marketing positioned it as the 'true sequel', leveraging franchise recognition.
- Price-history records show repeated substantial post-release discounts.
View full breakdownHide full breakdown
- Independent outlets noted the game mainly reused Postal 2 style and crude humor with limited innovation
Score factors
| Direction | Factor | Evidence | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| For | Technical launch and reviews | Aggregated critic coverage documents widespread bugs, poor optimization, and generally unfavorable reviews around the April 2022 release.[1] | +14 |
| For | Steep post-release discounts | Price-history trackers show the game received large discounts after release, with SteamDB recording much lower sale prices than the original listing.[2][3] | +14 |
| For | Derivative design and crude humor | Multiple reviews state the title largely reuses Postal 2's structure and crude comedic approach without substantial new design or improvement.[1][4] | +13 |
| For | Marketing as true sequel | The official Steam store text and publisher materials explicitly billed Postal 4 as the 'long-awaited true sequel' to Postal 2, using franchise recognition in promotion.[5] | +9 |
| Against | Ongoing updates and Early Access history | The title had an Early Access history and later storefront/news posts and reviews note post-release updates, indicating ongoing developer support after launch.[1] | -6 |
| Against | Some outlets note ambition despite flaws | At least one major outlet highlighted the game's ambitions and ideas even while criticizing its amateurish execution and taste.[6] | -3 |
Confidence: Medium · Reviews, storefront text, and price-history sites give strong evidence of low-quality launch, branding leverage, and steep discounts, but I found no sourced evidence of predatory monetization like microtransactions or deceptive refund practices. · Researched 2026-08-18
Sources reviewed
- [1]www.metacritic.com
- [2]steamdb.info
- [3]steampricehistory.com
- [4]www.gamereactor.eu
- [5]store.steampowered.com
- [6]www.pcgamer.com
- [7]store.steampowered.com
- [8]store.steampowered.com
- [9]store.steampowered.com
- [10]store.steampowered.com
View 30 more sourcesShow fewer sources
- [11]store.steampowered.com
- [12]help.steampowered.com
- [13]www.mobygames.com
- [14]club.steam250.com
- [15]gamefaqs.gamespot.com
- [16]en.wikipedia.org
- [17]www.reddit.com
- [18]www.reddit.com
- [19]www.reddit.com
- [20]jimnycricket.de
- [21]www.reddit.com
- [22]www.reddit.com
- [23]www.reddit.com
- [24]www.reddit.com
- [25]www.metacritic.com
- [26]www.metacritic.com
- [27]handwiki.org
- [28]www.metacritic.com
- [29]store.steampowered.com
- [30]progameguides.com
- [31]www.thedrastikmeasure.com
- [32]www.gog.com
- [33]www.wikidata.org
- [34]www.gadgetspeak.com
- [35]en.wikipedia.org
- [36]en.wikipedia.org
- [37]en.wikipedia.org
- [38]en.wikipedia.org
- [39]ru.wikipedia.org
- [40]bloc-immo.com
Does the community agree?
Agree or disagree with the AI's cash-grab read. One vote per browser on this title.
Loading community verdict…