
Outer Worlds: Murder on Eridanos
2021
The sourced concerns are substantially offset by delivered value.
What counts as a cash grab?
Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.
Why?
The Outer Worlds: Murder on Eridanos is a paid narrative expansion released March 17, 2021 that Obsidian and Private Division sold individually for $14.99 or bundled in an expansion pass for $24.99. Official materials and store listings describe new locations, quests, gear, and a self-contained detective story on Eridanos, while press and player reactions were mixed, praising the writing and new genre emphasis but noting launch bugs and some players questioning whether the amount of content justified the full standalone price.
- Publisher announced a standalone price of $14.99 and a $24.99 expansion pass bundle.
- Multiple reviews and user comments praised new detective-focused content and worldbuilding.
- Some reviewers and user feedback called the DLC buggy at launch and questioned full-price value.
View full breakdownHide full breakdown
- The DLC was offered in a discounted bundle and with a Game Pass owner discount, showing consumer pricing options.
Score factors
| Direction | Factor | Evidence | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Against | Substantive new narrative content | Publisher and store descriptions and outlets describe new quests, a distinct Eridanos location with floating islands, and a dedicated murder-investigation storyline as original content for the expansion.[1][2][3] | -16 |
| For | Official pricing | Obsidian's announcement and store listings state the DLC was sold individually for $14.99 and available in an Expansion Pass for $24.99 with a 10% discount for Xbox Game Pass owners.[1][2] | +15 |
| Against | Praised writing and design | Multiple reviews noted the DLC leans into a detective tone and praised its writing, set pieces, and some technical presentation, indicating nontrivial production effort and creative intent.[6][7] | -14 |
| For | Reviews questioned value | Aggregated critic and user pages and some reviews include comments that the DLC felt short for its full standalone price and that some players felt it was not worth full price at launch.[4][5] | +11 |
| Against | Bundle and discounts available | The expansion was sold as part of a discounted Expansion Pass and storefronts offered sales and platform-specific discounts, which reduced the effective consumer price compared to buying the DLC at full cost.[1][3] | -8 |
| For | Launch stability issues reported | User reports and aggregated review comments cited bugs at launch, with some players and reviewers describing issues that affected early perceptions of the DLC.[4][5] | +6 |
Confidence: High · Assessment is based on publisher announcements, official store pages, press releases, and multiple independent reviews and user aggregation pages; there is no sourced evidence of predatory monetization or deliberate low-effort reuse beyond typical DLC length and launch bug complaints. · Researched 2026-09-19
Sources reviewed
- [1]www.obsidian.net
- [2]store.epicgames.com
- [3]ir.take2games.com
- [4]www.metacritic.com
- [5]www.gamespot.com
- [6]www.tech-gaming.com
- [7]lordsofgaming.net
- [8]blog.playstation.com
- [9]gamefaqs.gamespot.com
- [10]www.dekudeals.com
View 25 more sourcesShow fewer sources
- [11]www.metacritic.com
- [12]www.pcgamesn.com
- [13]gamefaqs.gamespot.com
- [14]en.wikipedia.org
- [15]s24.q4cdn.com
- [16]www.reddit.com
- [17]www.reddit.com
- [18]ir.take2games.com
- [19]www.reddit.com
- [20]eu-southeast-2a.s3.dt.net.tr
- [21]www.reddit.com
- [22]www.reddit.com
- [23]rpgwatch.com
- [24]gamegeeker.com
- [25]gamegeeker.com
- [26]survivorslikes.com
- [27]www.gog.com
- [28]gamegeeker.com
- [29]gamegeeker.com
- [30]gamegeeker.com
- [31]www.thexboxhub.com
- [32]gamegeeker.com
- [33]mp1st.com
- [34]forums.whirlpool.net.au
- [35]stouchentertainment.com
What does the community think?
The AI sees low cash-grab risk. What's your read?
Loading community verdict…