Game

Library Of Ruina

2021

Insufficient evidence

We did not find enough credible, independent evidence to publish a numeric cash-grab score. Unrated is more honest than a guess.

What counts as a cash grab?

Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.

Why?

Library Of Ruina is a premium single‑purchase indie deckbuilding/RPG first available in early access on May 15, 2020 and fully released August 10, 2021. The Steam store and publisher disclosures show optional paid DLC limited to an artbook and soundtrack, community discussion and storefront listings show no in‑game microtransactions, and developer/press material documents distinct music, art and writing work. Independent reviews praise the music, art and narrative while some console ports earned mixed technical/UX criticism, there is no credible reporting that Project Moon prioritized extraction over substantive creative value.

The base product is sold as a single premium purchase with no reported in‑game microtransactions.
Paid extras are limited to an optional soundtrack and an artbook sold separately on Steam.
Developer materials and the artbook note dedicated staff roles, original music contributions and production effort.

View full breakdown

Score factors

Direction	Factor	Evidence	Impact
Against	Optional paid DLC	Project Moon offered optional paid DLC on Steam, namely a soundtrack and an artbook each listed at $19.99, which are sold separately from the main game.[1][2]	-11
Against	Production effort and craft	Developer and artbook materials document dedicated staff roles, original music contributions and developer notes, the soundtrack credits include Mili and EIM, supporting that meaningful production craft was invested.[4][1][3]	-18
Against	Critical and user reception	Steam user reviews are overwhelmingly positive on PC while aggregator critic scores for some console ports are mixed, indicating substantive consumer appreciation for the core product but some port/UX issues.[2][5]	-12

Confidence: Low · No source-backed commercial-extraction signal was found. · Researched 2026-07-24

Sources reviewed

View 135 more sources

Run Library Of Ruina through another test

Did they use AI?Evidence tracker — coming soon

Back to the woke verdict