
Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds
2017
The sourced concerns are substantially offset by delivered value.
What counts as a cash grab?
Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.
Why?
Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds was released in November 2017 as a paid expansion that requires ownership of Horizon Zero Dawn, and the developer described it as a new area with new storylines, characters and machines. Contemporary reviews from outlets such as GameSpot and IGN characterized the expansion as a substantive addition rather than a thin add-on. The DLC was later bundled into a Complete Edition and was included in Play At Home promotions, and I found no credible reporting that the expansion used predatory monetization tactics or deceptive release practices.
- The Frozen Wilds was a paid expansion that required the base game, sold separately according to the PlayStation Store.
- Guerrilla Games and the PlayStation Blog presented the DLC as a new area with new story, characters and machines.
- Major reviews (GameSpot, IGN) praised the expansion as meaningful added content rather than minimal reuse.
View full breakdownHide full breakdown
- The expansion was later bundled into a Complete Edition and temporarily distributed free via Play At Home, suggesting consumer-friendly availability.
Score factors
| Direction | Factor | Evidence | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Against | Independent reviews praised added content | Contemporary reviews from outlets including GameSpot evaluated The Frozen Wilds positively and described it as a generous, substantive boost to the base game rather than a minimal add-on.[1][2] | -16 |
| Against | Developer described substantive new content | Guerrilla Games announced The Frozen Wilds as adding a brand new area, new storylines, characters and experiences in the northern Banuk region.[3] | -14 |
| For | Paid expansion requiring base game | The Frozen Wilds was sold as a paid expansion and the PlayStation Store lists it as an add-on requiring the base game which is sold separately.[5] | +8 |
| Against | Bundled in Complete Edition and included in Play At Home | Sony and Guerrilla later bundled the expansion into a Complete Edition and made that edition available during Play At Home promotions, improving consumer access.[4][6] | -8 |
Confidence: High · Conclusions are based on primary developer announcements, official store listing and multiple contemporary major reviews, the remaining gap is internal studio financial intent which is not publicly documented. · Researched 2026-09-20
Sources reviewed
- [1]www.gamespot.com
- [2]bacol.todayz.workers.dev
- [3]www.guerrilla-games.com
- [4]sonyinteractive.com
- [5]store.playstation.com
- [6]www.guerrilla-games.com
- [7]gamefaqs.gamespot.com
- [8]www.gamespot.com
- [9]www.youtube.com
- [10]www.youtube.com
View 19 more sourcesShow fewer sources
- [11]www.gamespot.com
- [12]blog.br.playstation.com
- [13]en.wikipedia.org
- [14]blog.playstation.com
- [15]opencritic.com
- [16]media.gdcvault.com
- [17]www.guerrilla-games.com
- [18]en.wikipedia.org
- [19]tmng-al.uspto.gov
- [20]es.wikipedia.org
- [21]en.wikipedia.org
- [22]en.wikipedia.org
- [23]ru.wikipedia.org
- [24]www.reddit.com
- [25]dl.digra.org
- [26]www.reddit.com
- [27]www.reddit.com
- [28]gamesfray.com
- [29]www.100x100playstation.it
What does the community think?
The AI sees low cash-grab risk. What's your read?
Loading community verdict…