Game

Battlefield V

2018

18Score

Low Cash-Grab Risk

The sourced concerns are substantially offset by delivered value.

What counts as a cash grab?

Commercial extraction prioritized over meaningful consumer or creative value. Profit, popularity, adaptations, sequels, remakes, high budgets, and normal marketing do not count by themselves.

Why?

Battlefield V launched November 2018 as a high‑budget DICE/EA title with praise for its core gunplay and technical features but widespread criticism for a thin launch package and post‑release handling. Reviews and coverage documented eight launch maps, missing or delayed modes, and later introduction of a premium currency that sold certain epic cosmetics for real money. EA’s investor documents record 7.3 million units sold but note the release missed expectations and that resources and live‑service plans were adjusted afterward. Reporting shows some exploitative monetization signals, alongside formal promises of free content updates.

Kotaku documented the April 2019 addition of a premium currency that priced some epic cosmetics so they required purchasing Battlefield Currency rather than earned Company Coin, creating a grind/pay shortcut tension.
Major reviews and aggregators criticized a noticeably small launch content set, citing eight launch maps and multiple features deferred to post‑launch updates.
EA’s fiscal prepared remarks and Game Informer coverage state Battlefield V sold 7.3 million units, about 1 million fewer than expected, and EA said it adjusted priorities and investments after the launch.

View full breakdown

EA and outlets (Polygon, Variety, EA press release) publicly pledged no paid premium pass or pay‑to‑win loot boxes at launch and committed to free Tides of War updates, which mitigates a purely extractive model.

Score factors

Direction	Factor	Evidence	Impact
For	Premium currency and pay-only epic items	Kotaku reported that in April 2019 DICE added a purchasable Battlefield Currency and some new 'epic' cosmetics were only obtainable via that paid currency, with pack sizes that forced overpaying for individual items.[2]	+20
For	Underperformance triggered investment/prioritization changes	EA’s prepared remarks and reporting state Battlefield V sold 7.3 million copies by end of 2018, about 1 million fewer than EA had forecast, and EA noted it would reallocate investments and focus live‑service plans accordingly.[4][3]	+14
For	Small launch package and missing features	Contemporary reviews and aggregators repeatedly flagged that Battlefield V launched with a limited content set, noting eight launch maps, underdeveloped single‑player War Stories, bugs, and deferred multiplayer features.[6][5]	+11
Against	Tides of War free updates commitment	EA’s official launch press release and subsequent coverage described Tides of War as a free, ongoing content plan (maps, modes and chapters) rather than paid DLC, indicating a consumer‑facing update strategy.[1]	-10
Against	Public pledge against premium pass and non-cosmetic loot box	Pre‑release coverage and EA communications stated Battlefield V would ditch the old premium pass model and avoid loot boxes for non‑cosmetic items, delivering free Tides of War updates over time.[1]	-9
Against	High technical production and engine work	Technical coverage documented Battlefield V’s use of Frostbite, early real‑time ray tracing support and DLSS work, which are indicators of significant technical investment and production craft.[7][1]	-8

Confidence: High · Reporting from primary sources and major outlets (EA investor documents, GameSpot, Kotaku, Game Informer, Polygon/Variety) provides direct evidence on sales, launch content, and monetization; gaps remain around internal timetable decisions and exact revenue from cosmetic sales. · Researched 2026-07-27

Sources reviewed

View 118 more sources

What does the community think?

The AI sees low cash-grab risk. What's your read?

Loading community verdict…

Run Battlefield V through another test

Did they use AI?Evidence tracker

Back to the woke verdict